FusionReactor vs Elastic APM: Application Observability Comparison

Comparing FusionReactor and Elastic APM observability platforms based on verified G2 user reviews. See how support quality, ease of use, and overall satisfaction differ between these solutions.

Elastic Stack Extension vs. Integrated APM + Grafana

Elastic APM emerged from the powerful Elastic Stack (formerly ELK Stack)—a proven foundation for search, logging, and analytics. Many organizations already use Elasticsearch for log management and extend into APM capabilities. FusionReactor approaches observability differently: purpose-built application performance monitoring with deep runtime insights, AI-powered analysis, and Grafana dashboards included out of the box.

Key Advantage: FusionReactor is OpenTelemetry-native, supporting all OTel-compatible languages (Java, Node.js, Python, .NET, Go, Ruby, PHP, etc.) with specialized deep monitoring for ColdFusion/Java/Lucee. It ships with Grafana dashboards pre-built, plus the ability to create custom dashboards, and integrates with the full LGTM stack (Loki, Tempo, Mimir, Prometheus) when needed.

We analyzed verified G2 user reviews comparing FusionReactor and Elastic APM across 10 critical satisfaction dimensions. While Elastic APM lacks data for several categories, the available comparisons reveal significant differences in support quality, ease of administration, and overall user satisfaction.

If you're evaluating whether to extend your existing Elastic Stack investment into APM or adopt a dedicated monitoring platform that includes Grafana, this data-driven comparison provides essential insights.

Overall User Satisfaction Comparison

FusionReactor 73.69

Elastic APM 19.79

Scale: 0 to 100

Limited G2 Data Context: FusionReactor achieves a 73.69 overall satisfaction score vs. Elastic APM's 19.79. However, Elastic APM has only 14 total G2 reviews (0 in last 90 days) and lacks data for 7 of 10 categories. This score gap reflects limited review volume rather than comprehensive platform comparison. Elastic's broader user base (through Elastic Stack adoption) isn't captured in APM-specific G2 reviews.

Category-by-Category Performance

Available G2 Satisfaction Categories

Ease of Use

8.8

FusionReactor

+0.3

8.5

Elastic APM

Quality of Support ⭐

9.7

FusionReactor

+0.8

8.9

Elastic APM

Ease of Setup

9.0

FusionReactor

—

No Data

Ease of Admin

9.1

FusionReactor

—

No Data

Ease of Doing Business

9.5

FusionReactor

—

No Data

Meets Requirements

9.5

FusionReactor

+0.7

8.8

Elastic APM

Likelihood to Recommend ⭐⭐

9.6

FusionReactor

+1.6

8.0

Elastic APM

Product Direction ⭐

10.0

Elastic APM

+0.6

9.4

FusionReactor

Data Availability: FusionReactor leads in all 5 head-to-head categories with data. Elastic APM achieves a perfect 10.0 Product Direction score, reflecting confidence in Elastic Stack's roadmap integration. However, 7 of 10 categories lack sufficient Elastic APM review data for comparison.

Deep Dive: Measurable Differentiators

1. Quality of Support: Both Excel

FusionReactor 9.7 ⭐

Outstanding Support Experience

Elastic APM 8.9

Excellent Support Experience

Industry Average 7.5

Both Platforms Excel: Both FusionReactor (9.7) and Elastic APM (8.9) deliver well-above-industry-average support quality. The +0.8 FusionReactor advantage represents slightly faster response times rather than fundamental quality differences. Teams can expect excellent support from either platform.

What Users Say:

FusionReactor:

💬 "Customer support is stellar. Hands on, without too much bureaucracy...with quick turnaround times"
💬 "Support team provides expert solutions quickly, understanding our specific stack"
💬 "Consistently responsive across all customer tiers"

Elastic APM:

💬 "Elastic support is knowledgeable about the entire stack"
💬 "Strong community resources complement commercial support"
💬 "Premium support quality is excellent for complex issues"

Key Insight: Both platforms demonstrate excellent support quality. The marginal FusionReactor advantage reflects slightly faster average response times. Organizations already invested in Elastic Stack can expect strong APM support continuity.

2. Likelihood to Recommend: User Advocacy

Likelihood to Recommend (NPS) +1.6 Advantage

FusionReactor: 9.6

9.6

Elastic APM: 8.0

8.0

Largest Measurable Gap: The +1.6 point recommendation advantage (9.6 vs 8.0) is the largest gap across all categories with data. This suggests FusionReactor users are significantly more likely to advocate for the platform to peers.

What This Means: Likelihood to Recommend measures whether users would stake their professional reputation on recommending the product. FusionReactor's 9.6 score indicates exceptionally strong user advocacy. Elastic APM's 8.0 score is still positive but suggests some users may have reservations about recommending the APM component specifically (vs. the broader Elastic Stack).

3. Product Direction: Elastic's Perfect Score

Product Direction (% Positive) Elastic Advantage

Elastic APM: 10.0 (Perfect)

10.0

FusionReactor: 9.4

9.4

Perfect Vision Score: Elastic APM's 10.0 Product Direction score (tied with Honeycomb for only perfect scores in our comparison series) reflects exceptional confidence in the Elastic Stack roadmap. Users see clear, continuous innovation across the entire platform.

Why Elastic Excels Here: Elastic APM benefits from integration with the broader Elastic Stack roadmap. Users see consistent innovation across search, logging, security, and observability. This creates confidence that APM capabilities will evolve alongside the mature, proven platform.

4. Platform Scope: Dedicated APM vs. Stack Extension

Capability	FusionReactor	Elastic APM
Application Performance Monitoring	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Core Purpose	⭐⭐⭐⭐ Very Good
Grafana Dashboards	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Included + customizable	⭐⭐⭐ Via integration
Real-Time Profiling	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Deep Runtime	⭐⭐⭐ Basic
Database Query Monitoring	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Detailed	⭐⭐⭐⭐ Available
JVM/Memory Analysis	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Specialized	⭐⭐⭐ Via metrics
Distributed Tracing	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ OpenTelemetry	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Excellent
Log Aggregation	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Built-in + Loki integration	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Elasticsearch (best-in-class)
Full-Text Search	⭐⭐⭐ Basic	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Elasticsearch (unmatched)
Metrics Storage & Analysis	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Built-in + Mimir/Prometheus	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Elasticsearch
Security Monitoring (SIEM)	⭐ Not Available	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Elastic Security
AI-Powered Insights	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ OpsPilot	⭐⭐⭐⭐ Machine Learning
OpenTelemetry Language Support	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Native (all OTel languages)	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Supported
ColdFusion/Java Deep Monitoring	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Specialized (beyond OTel)	⭐⭐⭐ Generic
Existing Stack Integration	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ LGTM + Elastic compatible	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Seamless (Elastic Stack)

Complementary Strengths: FusionReactor excels at dedicated APM depth (profiling, runtime analysis, JVM monitoring) with Grafana dashboards included. Elastic APM excels when integrated with existing Elastic Stack investments (search, logs, security). Many organizations already using Elasticsearch for logging find APM a natural extension. Choose based on existing infrastructure and primary use case.

Review Volume & Market Context

Total Reviews (Overall)

FusionReactor 169 reviews

Elastic APM 14 reviews

Reviews (Last 90 Days)

FusionReactor 11 reviews

Elastic APM 0 reviews

Extremely Limited APM-Specific G2 Data: Elastic APM has only 14 total G2 reviews (0 in last 90 days), resulting in missing data for 7 of 10 categories. This doesn't reflect Elastic's massive user base—many Elastic Stack users review the broader platform rather than APM specifically. The limited sample size makes comprehensive comparison difficult.

Total Cost of Ownership Considerations

Annual Cost Comparison (Typical deployment)

FusionReactor

~$50K-$70K

Annual Cost

Platform Licensing (10-15 servers) $35K-$45K

Implementation $5K-$10K

Training $2K-$5K

Admin Overhead $8K-$10K

Grafana + LGTM Integration $0 (included)

Elastic APM (with Stack)

~$30K-$60K*

Incremental Annual Cost

APM Agents & Licensing $15K-$30K

APM Implementation $8K-$15K

Training (APM-specific) $3K-$8K

Additional Infrastructure $4K-$7K

*Assumes existing Elastic Stack investment

Standalone Elastic Stack deployment adds $40K-$80K annually

TCO Context: For organizations already invested in Elastic Stack, adding APM provides incremental value at lower cost than standalone platforms. For new implementations, total Elastic Stack + APM costs ($70K-$140K) compare to FusionReactor's all-in pricing ($50K-$70K) which includes Grafana dashboards and LGTM integration. Choose based on existing infrastructure and breadth requirements.

Platform Scorecard Summary

🏆 FusionReactor: 5 of 5 Head-to-Head Categories

Likelihood to Recommend

9.6 vs 8.0 (+1.6) ⭐

Quality of Support

9.7 vs 8.9 (+0.8) ⭐

Meets Requirements

9.5 vs 8.8 (+0.7) ⭐

Ease of Use

8.8 vs 8.5 (+0.3) ⭐

🏆 Elastic APM: 1 Category (Perfect Score)

Product Direction

10.0 vs 9.4 ⭐

(Perfect score reflects Elastic Stack roadmap confidence)

Limited Data Context

Elastic APM lacks G2 data for 7 of 10 categories (only 14 total reviews, 0 recent). This limits comprehensive comparison. Elastic's substantial user base through Elastic Stack adoption isn't reflected in APM-specific reviews.

Decision Guide: Which Platform Fits Your Needs?

✨ Choose FusionReactor When

✅

You need dedicated APM as primary monitoring

✅

You want Grafana dashboards included out of the box

✅

Deep runtime profiling is essential (JVM, memory, queries)

✅

You use OpenTelemetry-compatible languages (Java, Node.js, Python, .NET, Go, Ruby, PHP, etc.)

✅

You need specialized ColdFusion/Java/Lucee monitoring beyond generic OTel

✅

You want rapid deployment without stack assembly

✅

You don't have Elastic Stack deployed already

✅

AI-powered insights via OpsPilot are valuable

🔍 Choose Elastic APM When

✅

You already use Elastic Stack for logs/search

✅

Unified platform for logs + metrics + traces matters

✅

You need full-text search capabilities (Elasticsearch)

✅

Your team has Elastic expertise already

✅

Security monitoring (SIEM) is also required

✅

You want machine learning anomaly detection

✅

Open-source options are important

✅

Perfect product direction confidence (10.0) appeals

Key Takeaways

1. Extremely Limited G2 Data

Elastic APM has only 14 total G2 reviews (0 recent), lacking data for 7 of 10 categories. This doesn't reflect Elastic's massive user base—many review the broader Elastic Stack rather than APM specifically. Comprehensive comparison is limited by data availability.

2. Both Deliver Excellent Support

FusionReactor (9.7) and Elastic APM (8.9) both deliver well-above-industry-average support. The +0.8 advantage reflects marginal differences in response time rather than fundamental quality gaps. Both platforms provide excellent assistance.

3. FusionReactor Includes Grafana + LGTM Integration

FusionReactor ships with Grafana dashboards out of the box plus custom dashboard builder and full LGTM stack integration (Loki, Tempo, Mimir, Prometheus). Through OpenTelemetry-native architecture, it supports all OTel languages with specialized depth for ColdFusion/Java/Lucee.

4. Elastic's Perfect Product Direction

Elastic APM's 10.0 Product Direction score reflects exceptional confidence in the Elastic Stack roadmap. Users see APM evolving alongside proven search, logging, and security capabilities—creating strong long-term confidence.

5. Existing Infrastructure Determines Value

For organizations already using Elastic Stack, APM provides incremental value at lower cost. For new implementations, FusionReactor's standalone approach with included Grafana dashboards delivers faster time-to-value without stack complexity.

6. User Advocacy Difference

The +1.6 point recommendation gap (9.6 vs 8.0) is the largest measurable difference. FusionReactor users show significantly stronger advocacy for their platform. This may reflect APM being evaluated separately from broader Elastic Stack satisfaction.

Experience Purpose-Built APM + Grafana Included

🚀

Try FusionReactor Risk-Free

✓ Grafana dashboards included—ready in 1 hour

✓ Deep APM without stack complexity

✓ OpsPilot AI insights from day one

✓ LGTM + Elastic Stack compatible

Start Your Free Trial →

📊

See FusionReactor Live

→ See included Grafana dashboards

→ Compare standalone vs. Stack-integrated APM

→ Deep profiling capabilities demo

→ TCO analysis for your scenario

Book Your Demo →

About This Analysis

Data Source

G2 verified user reviews (accessed February 2025)

Review Period

Overall reviews + last 90 days

Methodology

Direct comparison of G2 satisfaction scores across 10 categories

Sample Size

FusionReactor (169 total, 11 recent) | Elastic APM (14 total, 0 recent)

*Elastic APM's limited G2 presence (14 reviews, 0 recent, 7 categories without data) doesn't reflect Elastic's substantial market presence through Elastic Stack adoption. Many users review the broader platform rather than APM specifically. Scores should be interpreted with caution given limited sample size.